On the 19th of May I hold a 60-minute introduction with regard to web to 2.0 tools in the educational seminar Oldenburg. I am curious very much like the talk / Mini-Workshop will run. The expiry should be structured as follows: Der Ablauf soll wie folgt strukturiert werden:
- Purification of the concepts Web 2.0, web 1.0 and Social media as well as short presentation some web 2.0 tools (see below).
- Deepening in the Wikiarbeit and RSS-Feeds.
- Participant feedback by comment function on impulse of thought
Two questions accompany me in the preparation: What should trainees about web 2.0 know? Which tools must be absolutely introduced? Welche Werkzeuge müssen unbedingt vorgestellt werden?
One is certain, all important web 2.0 subjects is to be torn impossibly. For example, will not be able to be treated the Authenzität in the web, security questions, dieverse platforms like mender, YouTube or Podcasts etc. My main attention lies first of all to indicate a possible use for trainees and teachers. Besides, I imagined that Wikis and RSS-Feeds own more or less the biggest potential. Dabei dachte ich mir, dass Wikis und RSS-Feeds so ziemlich das größte Potential besitzen.
Why just Wikis?
One can work together with Wikis well in groups. I think there just of the curriculum development in professional teams or the school development. At the moment I use for two classes own Wiki for the teaching documentation and supply of working sheets and sheets of information (here you look). Zur Zeit nutze ich für zwei Klassen ein eigenes Wiki zur Unterrichtsdokumentation und Bereitstellung von Arbeits- und Informationsblättern (guckst Du hier).
Why just RSS?
I find, the RSS tools are motivation tools! It serves to remain up-to-date. An example: In a professional seminar I have already held a small introduction about Wikis and the participants were persuaded at first of the added value absolutely. As a result we have brought to life a Seminar-Wiki. Now, however, it is in such a way that one hardly has time to the experimentation just in the Referendariat (what I regret very much). With the experimentation routines must be broken through. New, sometimes also uncomfortable is checked on the practise suitability. The trainees had lain down no RSS-Feed on the Wiki and therefore the Wiki hardly attracted attention. From own experience I feel it, however, as very motivating if "overnight" the invested article has further grown. Hence, I hold just in the early stage the supervision of the Wikiartikel for very recommendable. Ein Beispiel: In einem Fachseminar habe ich bereits eine kleine Einführung über Wikis gehalten und die Teilnehmer waren anfänglich vom Mehrwert durchaus überzeugt. Daraufhin haben wir ein Seminar-Wiki ins Leben gerufen. Nun ist es aber so, dass man gerade im Referendariat kaum Zeit zum Experimentieren hat (was ich sehr bedauere). Beim Experimentieren müssen Routinen durchbrochen werden. Neues, manchmal auch Unbequemes wird auf die Praxistauglichkeit hin überprüft. Die Referendare hatten sich keinen RSS-Feed auf das Wiki gelegt und somit fand das Wiki kaum noch Beachtung. Aus eigener Erfahrung empfinde ich es aber als sehr motivierend, wenn der angelegte Artikel “über Nacht” weiter gewachsen ist. Daher halte ich gerade in der Anfangsphase die Überwachung der Wikiartikel für sehr empfehlenswert.
Another reason, why the trainees the Wiki did not use, was the statement that they did not know what they could introduce. In addition compelling a common project which is worked on exclusively on the Wiki must exist. As soon as Dopplungen creep, as for example to write the article once again on Word, the Wikiprojekt is sentenced to death because the work with Word is already a routine and is not felt more than "tiresomely" in contrast to the Wiki. Sobald sich Dopplungen einschleichen, wie z.B. den Artikel noch einmal auf Word zu schreiben, ist das Wikiprojekt zum Tode verurteilt, weil die Arbeit mit Word bereits Routine ist und nicht mehr als “lästig” im Gegensatz zum Wiki empfunden wird.
The second part this article contains only the red thread for the presentation. Instead of a Powerpoint presentation I wanted to try out a direct visual company in the Blog. Time see, how does this come? Mal sehen, wie das ankommt?
Presentation
What does mean web 1.0 and what means web 2.0?
Of web log
Signs:
- Diary / learning diary
- Comment function
- Head / text area / site bar
- Interlinking with other Bloggern
Examples:
- Article Plankton of information
- Rete Mirabile from Andreas Kalt von Andreas Kalt
- (Supplement, 18.05.2010:Erfahrungen from a schoolboy's Blog project)
Twitter (Microblogging systems)
Signs
- Blogartikel with 140 signs
- Rapid spreading of news
- Acquisition tool
- Contact care
Examples:
- Twitterwall ThS01
- Project examples: A redness hand and children are more value!
Social Bookmarks
Signs
- Kollaborativ collecting
- Tagging (shed words)
- Tagclouds / trend clouds
- on-line / independently
Examples
Wikis
Signs
- Article side / discussion side / course side
- clear
- running feedback
- Simplicity
- variously
- dynamically
- Actuality
- Identification
Examples:
- BS-Wiki of the vocational schools of Winsen
- BBS-Technik-Cloppenburg
RSS (Really simple Syndication)
Signs
- Inform
- Motivation with the article provide in Wikis
- "Newsletter"
- Feed reader
- RSS list
Job:
- Subscribe two RSS-Feeds with letter!
- Write a comment in this article to the questions:
Impulse of thought
German educational server
I can fancy not Wikis introduce for my work to start, because.:
The introduction was good / I lacked information, because …:
Who left with pleasure off-line, a small summary (introduction Web2.0) can burden itself down.
19/05/2010 At 09:56 Permalink
Hello, Thorsten,
two remarks.
a) http://twitter.com/ths01 is from my view a profile side and no Twitterwall. A Twitterwall would be rather a sort of this http://twitterwallr.com/w/referendariat a listing all public Tweets to a Hashtag, e.g., Referendariat.
b) I find the comparison of web log and diaries inappropriate. Though this is often said in such a way, but I see only very much few common characteristics. The contents of a diary are not public rather seldom, already at all for unknown ones. Also comments of readers and an exchange about the contents are seldom welcome in diaries. Only the contents are provided with date / Timestamp and a personal perspective (often, not always with Blogs!) it is shown a common characteristic seems to be. Der Inhalt eines Tagebuchs ist eher selten öffentlich, schon gar nicht für unbekannte. Auch Kommentare von Lesern und ein Austausch über die Inhalte sind in Tagebüchern selten erwünscht. Einzig das Inhalte mit Datum/Timestamp versehen sind und eine persönliche Perspektive (häufig, nicht immer bei Blogs!) dargestellt wird scheint eine Gemeinsamkeit zu sein.
But even the assortment in a diary is different than in a Blog (chronologically in the diary, reverse chronologically in the Blog).
Above all one can be of use Blogs, however, also for things go out the everyday life of the domestic animals (Catcontent) and observations of the everyday life or respect problems.
E.G. Your Blog, but also many other EduBlogs show this in my opinion very nicely.
Why I write this here? I believe this diary comparison holds many people of it from a Blog to lead. Many would not like to sweep at all on her most internal after Outside. For a professional exchange about the usual borders away (e.g., own teacher seminar, own school or class) Blogs are not suitable very much, diaries. Viele möchten gar nicht ihr innerstes nach Außen kehren. Für einen professionellen Austausch über die gewohnten Grenzen hinweg (z.B. eigenes Lehrerseminar, eigene Schule oder Klasse) sind Blogs sehr geeignet, Tagebücher nicht.
I have written to one of my last web 2.0 for trainees courses also sometimes a Blogbeitrag.
Maybe this is also interesting for your participants!?
Greetings Ralf
HP: Is sorry me that I come only now for commenting. This would have certainly been better before the Workshop … Das wäre vor dem Workshop sicher besser gewesen…
19/05/2010 At 15:40 Permalink
Moin
AndreasRalf!I would have already almost been surprised if nobody had in addition written something.
to a) Yes, the ths01 page is a profile side. I have only chosen this link to log in faster on the Twitterseite. However, makes no difference also anyhow whether I had on http://www.twitter.com or on http://www.twitter.com/ths01 verlinkt. I have shown the twitter.com side. It is not a real Twitterwall also, because one sees no running Tweets with Hashtags. One must activate the new Tweets over and over again. I could not show a real Twitterwall like on an EduCamp or bar camp. Ist aber auch irgendwie egal, ob ich auf http://www.twitter.com oder auf http://www.twitter.com/ths01 verlinkt hätte. Gezeigt habe ich die twitter.com Seite. Eine echte Twitterwall ist es auch nicht, da man keine laufenden Tweets mit Hashtags sieht. Man muss die neuen Tweets immer wieder aktivieren. Eine echte Twitterwall wie auf einem EduCamp oder BarCamp konnte ich nicht zeigen.
to b): Also here I must agree with you anyhow. One must explain the expression diary or learning diary of course (I have also explained in the seminar). But how one says so nicely, one must fetch his listeners. From approx. 20 trainees 16 did not know the concept “Web 2.0 ″, diary, however, everybody. With a 60-minute introduction quite a lot of remains on the distance. It was for me in the introduction about the use for the school. In the break I have got absolutely positive feedback. Indeed, some meant them would have no time to try out, for example, a Wiki sometimes. Den Ausdruck Tagebuch oder Lerntagebuch muss man natürlich erklären (habe ich auch im Seminar erklärt). Aber wie heißt es so schön, man muss seine Zuhörer abholen. Von ca. 20 Referendaren kannten 16 den Begriff “Web 2.0″ nicht, Tagebuch hingegen alle. Mit einer 60 minütigen Einführung bleibt so manches auf der Strecke. Mir ging es in der Einführung um den Nutzen für die Schule. In der Pause habe ich durchaus positives Feedback bekommen. Allerdings meinten einige sie hätten keine Zeit, um zum Beispiel ein Wiki mal auszuprobieren….
19/05/2010 At 16:32 Permalink
Who is then Andreas?
19/05/2010 At 16:36 Permalink
Ralf of course, sorry! I had someone else before eyes with the writing …
Have you for it in my Blog roll taken up.
19/05/2010 At 20:05 Permalink
Oh poor Andreas. Nevertheless, he also wanted in the Blogroll.
Well, Andreas stands directly under me in the Blogroll